Politics
Maj. Gen. Ibrahim Sani, chief of transformation and innovation for the Nigerian Army, said his country is countering the threat of Boko Haram and other asymmetric threats by “thinking outside the box.” The military is taking the fight to what he calls “dark networks” of terrorists with a combination of technology, improved training and a newly created Nigerian Army Special Operations Command (NASOC). Speaking to Africa Defense Forum (ADF) earlier this year at the Global Special Operations Forces Foundation conference in St. Petersburg, Florida, Sani said his job is to look for innovative solutions to emerging threats. “I look at administration, I look at operations, I look at logistics, I look at everything you can think of and ask, ‘What does the Nigerian Army require to be able to meet the current challenges?’” he said. “Once I don’t see it, I look at the possibility of how to go about it.” Technology: Among the latest technology his office has worked to introduce is the Nigerian Army Low Altitude Platform Station. This balloon-based platform has a surveillance range of 5 kilometers and provides real-time images to Army units.
The Army also is introducing a mobile remote sensing device known as a TM-1. This unit can detect human-borne improvised explosive devices (IEDs) or suicide vests from a distance of 500 meters or more. The plan is to have these available at all military checkpoints and control points. To gather data from the widest range of sources, the Army has set up the Nigerian Army Information Processing Center. This open-source data collection center asks the public to call, email or send text messages to alert the Army of emergencies or terrorist activity. In addition to gathering information about security threats, the center lets citizens report unprofessional conduct by Soldiers without fear of retribution. “Whatever we get from the public, we collect, analyze and within 15 minutes we send it to the location, to the formation or unit where the emergency is occurring,” Sani said. So we get on-the-spot information of what is happening in real time at a distance.”
NASOC: The Nigerian military is standing up a Special Operations Force composed of fewer than 1,500 highly trained Soldiers. The five- to 10-year process began in 2014 with help from U.S. Special Operations Command Africa. The military will select and train the fighting force with an emphasis on speed, precision and low-visibility operations. “Humans are more important than hardware and quality is more important than quantity, and they cannot be mass-produced,” Sani said. “If you have 5,000 guys who apply, if you are lucky you might get 500.” Training: To combat IEDs, Nigeria worked with the U.S. Office of Security Cooperation to produce a handbook on how to detect and disable explosives, and it has expanded training on asymmetric warfare. At border checkpoints, Nigeria is employing the “cluster approach” in which a group comprised of individuals from various government agencies, the military, police, customs and immigration are trained together and work together at an outpost. “The approach has brought about the integration of all relevant agencies in training and the conduct of operations,” Sani said. “On the whole, we are embarking on new forms of training with customs, immigration, state security and police. So each one, we are integrating them, enhancing their responsibilities and their constitutional tasks.”
- Details
- Ngwa Bertrand
- Hits: 1864
Maj. Gen. Ibrahim Sani, chief of transformation and innovation for the Nigerian Army, said his country is countering the threat of Boko Haram and other asymmetric threats by “thinking outside the box.” The military is taking the fight to what he calls “dark networks” of terrorists with a combination of technology, improved training and a newly created Nigerian Army Special Operations Command (NASOC). Speaking to Africa Defense Forum (ADF) earlier this year at the Global Special Operations Forces Foundation conference in St. Petersburg, Florida, Sani said his job is to look for innovative solutions to emerging threats. “I look at administration, I look at operations, I look at logistics, I look at everything you can think of and ask, ‘What does the Nigerian Army require to be able to meet the current challenges?’” he said. “Once I don’t see it, I look at the possibility of how to go about it.” Technology: Among the latest technology his office has worked to introduce is the Nigerian Army Low Altitude Platform Station. This balloon-based platform has a surveillance range of 5 kilometers and provides real-time images to Army units.
The Army also is introducing a mobile remote sensing device known as a TM-1. This unit can detect human-borne improvised explosive devices (IEDs) or suicide vests from a distance of 500 meters or more. The plan is to have these available at all military checkpoints and control points. To gather data from the widest range of sources, the Army has set up the Nigerian Army Information Processing Center. This open-source data collection center asks the public to call, email or send text messages to alert the Army of emergencies or terrorist activity. In addition to gathering information about security threats, the center lets citizens report unprofessional conduct by Soldiers without fear of retribution. “Whatever we get from the public, we collect, analyze and within 15 minutes we send it to the location, to the formation or unit where the emergency is occurring,” Sani said. So we get on-the-spot information of what is happening in real time at a distance.”
NASOC: The Nigerian military is standing up a Special Operations Force composed of fewer than 1,500 highly trained Soldiers. The five- to 10-year process began in 2014 with help from U.S. Special Operations Command Africa. The military will select and train the fighting force with an emphasis on speed, precision and low-visibility operations. “Humans are more important than hardware and quality is more important than quantity, and they cannot be mass-produced,” Sani said. “If you have 5,000 guys who apply, if you are lucky you might get 500.” Training: To combat IEDs, Nigeria worked with the U.S. Office of Security Cooperation to produce a handbook on how to detect and disable explosives, and it has expanded training on asymmetric warfare. At border checkpoints, Nigeria is employing the “cluster approach” in which a group comprised of individuals from various government agencies, the military, police, customs and immigration are trained together and work together at an outpost. “The approach has brought about the integration of all relevant agencies in training and the conduct of operations,” Sani said. “On the whole, we are embarking on new forms of training with customs, immigration, state security and police. So each one, we are integrating them, enhancing their responsibilities and their constitutional tasks.”
- Details
- Ngwa Bertrand
- Hits: 2066
The United States is squandering billions of dollars on its offensive weapons capability, while China is spending on developing its country and social programs, an American researcher in California says. Dennis Etler, a professor of Anthropology at Cabrillo College in Aptos, California, made the remarks on Wednesday while commenting on a report which says US F-35 fighter jets would be outmaneuvered and outgunned in dogfights with current Russian and Chinese aircraft.
The latest-generation fighter aircraft F-35 “has been shown to be totally inadequate to meet the challenge of the aircraft flown by both Russia and China, and most likely would not fare well in any sort of confrontation,” Etler said. “But but the real issue for the American people is the vast amount of money being squandered on the military-industrial complex in the United States,” he added. The F-35 has encountered numerous design and production problems since it was first conceived as the US military’s fifth-generation stealth aircraft more than ten years ago. Its original $400 billion price tag has doubled, with analysts predicting more hikes yet to come.
"Just imagine 400 billion dollars, what that could do in terms of really enhancing the security of the United States, which basically would entail raising the educational level of the American people by making college affordable, and improving the infrastructure of the country,” Etler said. “Imagine, China with tens of thousands of miles of high-speed rail, while in the US we don’t even have one mile of high-speed rail.
Four hundred billion dollars spent on developing infrastructure and new modes of transportation would kick-start the reindustrialization of the US and contribute to job growth and the like,” he stated. “Four hundred billion dollars is just a pittance compared to the entire military budget of the US, which consumes over half of the discretionary spending that the government engages in, and where is the threat? What is the threat to the US national security from overseas? Who is about to invade the United States and occupy its territory, as the US has done throughout the world?” Etler observed.
“Obviously there is no threat to the US and US interests other than those which are conjured up by the United States’ government itself to give it the excuse to go about intervening wherever it deems necessary in order to maintain its global hegemony,” he noted. “So there’s no ‘defense budget’ that the US funds. It’s a purely offensive budget to secure US control over the world’s resources.
This is just one glaring example of that. And not only is it a colossal waste of money, it’s also been shown to be an example of incompetence and corruption on the part of the US military-industrial complex, which is just out to feather its own nest,” the political commentator concluded.
- Details
- Ngwa Bertrand
- Hits: 1660
The United States is squandering billions of dollars on its offensive weapons capability, while China is spending on developing its country and social programs, an American researcher in California says. Dennis Etler, a professor of Anthropology at Cabrillo College in Aptos, California, made the remarks on Wednesday while commenting on a report which says US F-35 fighter jets would be outmaneuvered and outgunned in dogfights with current Russian and Chinese aircraft.
The latest-generation fighter aircraft F-35 “has been shown to be totally inadequate to meet the challenge of the aircraft flown by both Russia and China, and most likely would not fare well in any sort of confrontation,” Etler said. “But but the real issue for the American people is the vast amount of money being squandered on the military-industrial complex in the United States,” he added. The F-35 has encountered numerous design and production problems since it was first conceived as the US military’s fifth-generation stealth aircraft more than ten years ago. Its original $400 billion price tag has doubled, with analysts predicting more hikes yet to come.
"Just imagine 400 billion dollars, what that could do in terms of really enhancing the security of the United States, which basically would entail raising the educational level of the American people by making college affordable, and improving the infrastructure of the country,” Etler said. “Imagine, China with tens of thousands of miles of high-speed rail, while in the US we don’t even have one mile of high-speed rail.
Four hundred billion dollars spent on developing infrastructure and new modes of transportation would kick-start the reindustrialization of the US and contribute to job growth and the like,” he stated. “Four hundred billion dollars is just a pittance compared to the entire military budget of the US, which consumes over half of the discretionary spending that the government engages in, and where is the threat? What is the threat to the US national security from overseas? Who is about to invade the United States and occupy its territory, as the US has done throughout the world?” Etler observed.
“Obviously there is no threat to the US and US interests other than those which are conjured up by the United States’ government itself to give it the excuse to go about intervening wherever it deems necessary in order to maintain its global hegemony,” he noted. “So there’s no ‘defense budget’ that the US funds. It’s a purely offensive budget to secure US control over the world’s resources.
This is just one glaring example of that. And not only is it a colossal waste of money, it’s also been shown to be an example of incompetence and corruption on the part of the US military-industrial complex, which is just out to feather its own nest,” the political commentator concluded.
- Details
- Ngwa Bertrand
- Hits: 1476
The United States is squandering billions of dollars on its offensive weapons capability, while China is spending on developing its country and social programs, an American researcher in California says. Dennis Etler, a professor of Anthropology at Cabrillo College in Aptos, California, made the remarks on Wednesday while commenting on a report which says US F-35 fighter jets would be outmaneuvered and outgunned in dogfights with current Russian and Chinese aircraft.
The latest-generation fighter aircraft F-35 “has been shown to be totally inadequate to meet the challenge of the aircraft flown by both Russia and China, and most likely would not fare well in any sort of confrontation,” Etler said. “But but the real issue for the American people is the vast amount of money being squandered on the military-industrial complex in the United States,” he added. The F-35 has encountered numerous design and production problems since it was first conceived as the US military’s fifth-generation stealth aircraft more than ten years ago. Its original $400 billion price tag has doubled, with analysts predicting more hikes yet to come.
"Just imagine 400 billion dollars, what that could do in terms of really enhancing the security of the United States, which basically would entail raising the educational level of the American people by making college affordable, and improving the infrastructure of the country,” Etler said. “Imagine, China with tens of thousands of miles of high-speed rail, while in the US we don’t even have one mile of high-speed rail.
Four hundred billion dollars spent on developing infrastructure and new modes of transportation would kick-start the reindustrialization of the US and contribute to job growth and the like,” he stated. “Four hundred billion dollars is just a pittance compared to the entire military budget of the US, which consumes over half of the discretionary spending that the government engages in, and where is the threat? What is the threat to the US national security from overseas? Who is about to invade the United States and occupy its territory, as the US has done throughout the world?” Etler observed.
“Obviously there is no threat to the US and US interests other than those which are conjured up by the United States’ government itself to give it the excuse to go about intervening wherever it deems necessary in order to maintain its global hegemony,” he noted. “So there’s no ‘defense budget’ that the US funds. It’s a purely offensive budget to secure US control over the world’s resources.
This is just one glaring example of that. And not only is it a colossal waste of money, it’s also been shown to be an example of incompetence and corruption on the part of the US military-industrial complex, which is just out to feather its own nest,” the political commentator concluded.
- Details
- Ngwa Bertrand
- Hits: 1788
The United States is squandering billions of dollars on its offensive weapons capability, while China is spending on developing its country and social programs, an American researcher in California says. Dennis Etler, a professor of Anthropology at Cabrillo College in Aptos, California, made the remarks on Wednesday while commenting on a report which says US F-35 fighter jets would be outmaneuvered and outgunned in dogfights with current Russian and Chinese aircraft.
The latest-generation fighter aircraft F-35 “has been shown to be totally inadequate to meet the challenge of the aircraft flown by both Russia and China, and most likely would not fare well in any sort of confrontation,” Etler said. “But but the real issue for the American people is the vast amount of money being squandered on the military-industrial complex in the United States,” he added. The F-35 has encountered numerous design and production problems since it was first conceived as the US military’s fifth-generation stealth aircraft more than ten years ago. Its original $400 billion price tag has doubled, with analysts predicting more hikes yet to come.
"Just imagine 400 billion dollars, what that could do in terms of really enhancing the security of the United States, which basically would entail raising the educational level of the American people by making college affordable, and improving the infrastructure of the country,” Etler said. “Imagine, China with tens of thousands of miles of high-speed rail, while in the US we don’t even have one mile of high-speed rail.
Four hundred billion dollars spent on developing infrastructure and new modes of transportation would kick-start the reindustrialization of the US and contribute to job growth and the like,” he stated. “Four hundred billion dollars is just a pittance compared to the entire military budget of the US, which consumes over half of the discretionary spending that the government engages in, and where is the threat? What is the threat to the US national security from overseas? Who is about to invade the United States and occupy its territory, as the US has done throughout the world?” Etler observed.
“Obviously there is no threat to the US and US interests other than those which are conjured up by the United States’ government itself to give it the excuse to go about intervening wherever it deems necessary in order to maintain its global hegemony,” he noted. “So there’s no ‘defense budget’ that the US funds. It’s a purely offensive budget to secure US control over the world’s resources.
This is just one glaring example of that. And not only is it a colossal waste of money, it’s also been shown to be an example of incompetence and corruption on the part of the US military-industrial complex, which is just out to feather its own nest,” the political commentator concluded.
- Details
- Ngwa Bertrand
- Hits: 1500
Subcategories
Biya Article Count: 73
# Paul Biya and his regime
Explore the political landscape of Cameroon under the rule of Paul Biya, the longest-serving president in Africa who has been in power since 1982. Our Paul Biya and his regime section examines the policies, actions, and controversies of his government, as well as the opposition movements, civil society groups, and international actors that challenge or support his leadership. You'll also find profiles, interviews, and opinions on the key figures and events that shape the political dynamics of Cameroon.
Southern Cameroons Article Count: 549
.# Southern Cameroons, Ambazonia
Learn more about the history, culture, and politics of Ambazonia, the Anglophone regions of Cameroon that have been seeking self-determination and independence from the Francophone-dominated central government. Our Southern Cameroons section covers the ongoing conflict, the humanitarian crisis, the human rights violations, and the peace efforts in the region. You'll also find stories that highlight the rich and diverse heritage, traditions, and aspirations of the Southern Cameroonian people.
Editorial Article Count: 885
# Opinion
Get insights and perspectives on the issues that matter to Cameroon and the world with our opinion section. We feature opinions from our editors, columnists, and guest writers, who share their views and analysis on various topics, such as politics, economy, culture, and society. Our opinion section also welcomes contributions from our readers, who can submit their own opinions and comments. Join the conversation and express your opinions with our opinion section.
